Franconia Associates v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION ON RECONSIDERATION
REGINALD W. GIBSON, Senior Judge.
In the course of this opinion, issued on plaintiff Franconia Associates’ May 20, 1999, motion for reconsideration, familiarity with the facts and legal arguments as enunciated in this court’s opinion in Franconia Associates v. United States, 43 Fed.Cl. 702 (1999), is an imperative and will be assumed.
This court, in the noted opinion disputed by Franconia, dismissed those plaintiffs whose claims were premised on pre-1979 low-income housing loans because their claims were time barred. We also denied Franconia’s motion for summary…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Merrion v. Jicarilla Apache TribeSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Yuba Natural Resources, Inc. v. The United States, Defendant/cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1990
- Bowen v. Public Agencies Opposed to Social Security EntrapmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Yankee Atomic Electric Company, Plaintiff/cross-Appellant v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1997
- Frito-Lay of Puerto Rico, Inc. v. CañasDistrict Court, D. Puerto Rico · 1981
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Henderson County Drainage District No. 3 v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2003
- Citizens Federal Bank v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2002
- General Dynamics Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2000
- Shell Petroleum, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2000
- Coconut Grove Entertainment, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2000
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.