Legal Opinion
Krauss Bros. Lumber Co. v. Dimon S. S. Corp.
District Court, W.D. Washington
Decided August 4, 1931No. Nos. 13120, 13117, 13090, 13093, 13105PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
NETERER, District Judge.
The three last-named cases were heretofore submitted and exceptions sustained. Petition for rehearing is filed. The first two cases are now submitted upon exceptions.
The libels are practically the same. Each seeks to recover an amount alleged to be due under a provision contained in a contract at a given rate of affreightment per thousand feet, with a provision “in the event regular intereoastal carrier moves similar cargo at lower rate, such lower rate to be applied.” The libels were filed about seventeen months after the cargo was carried, delivered, and paid for. It…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- The BelfastSupreme Court of the United States · 1869
- Vandewater v. MillsSupreme Court of the United States · 1857
- People's Ferry Company of Boston v. BeersSupreme Court of the United States · 1858
- The Steamer EclipseSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
- Schooner Freeman, &C. v. BuckinghamSupreme Court of the United States · 1856
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Sword Line, Inc., Libelant-Appellant v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1956
- The Pacific SpruceDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 1932
- United States v. One Cadillac Town AutomobileDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 1932
- Rice v. Vancouver S. S. Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1932
- Sword Line, Inc., Libelant-Appellant v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1956
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.