Legal Opinion
The Pacific Spruce
District Court, W.D. Washington
Decided November 7, 1932No. 13245PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtNeterer, District Judge
(after stating the facts as above).
Has intervening libelant an action in tort, and, if so, “a lien for damages arising out of tort,” and preferred to mortgage of the libelant, by section 953, title 46, USCA.
On delivery and stowage of cargo on shipboard, the ship became bound to the ear-go and the cargo to the ship. The Pacific Hemlock (D. C.) 53 F.(2d) 492. The vessel, a common carrier, a common ship carrying eargo for hire, was bound to receive and carry tendered cargo for just compensation over its regular route, and to transport sueh cargo without unreasonable delay. Wabash R. Co. v.…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- New Jersey Steam Navigation Company v. MERCHANTS'BANK.Supreme Court of the United States · 1848
- Bowman v. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1888
- The John G. StevensSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
- York Company v. Central RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1866
- Constable v. National Steamship Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1894
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Kopac International, Inc. v. M/V Bold VentureDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 1986
- Oriente Commercial, Inc. v. American Flag VesselCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1975
- Oriente Commercial, Inc. v. The American Flag VesselCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1975