Legal Opinion

Matter of Bell

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided October 4, 1991Published

1Opinion of the Court

126 N.J. 261 (1991)

596 A.2d 752

IN THE MATTER OF MICHAEL J. BELL, AN ATTORNEY-AT-LAW.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Argued September 26, 1989.

Decided October 4, 1991.

John J. Janasie, Deputy Ethics Counsel, argued the cause on behalf of Office of Attorney Ethics.

Matthew Boylan argued the cause for respondent (Lowenstein, Sandler, Kohl, Fisher & Boylan, attorneys).

2Per curiam

This matter stems from three complaints filed against respondent following an audit of his books and records. The District VI Ethics Committee (Ethics Committee) found that respondent had engaged in conduct involving dishonesty and…

Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part.

3Cases cited8 opinions

  1. In Re WilsonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1979
  2. Matter of NoonanSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1986
  3. In Re JacobSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1984
  4. Matter of FleischerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1986
  5. Matter of KonopkaSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1991

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API