Norco Sales Co. v. United States
United States Customs Court
1Opinion of the Court
Maletz, Judge:
These two consolidated appeals for reappraisement involve the question as to the proper dutiable value of certain sets of tools that were manufactured and exported to this country in 1965 and 1966 by the Lobster Tool Co. of Osaka, Japan.1 The articles were invoiced at ex-factory prices, plus additional charges — noted on the invoices — -for “’handling commissions,” storage, hauling and light *779erage, inland insurance premiums and inland freight to port. The articles were entered at the ex-factory prices without including these additional charges as part of the dutiable value.…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- United States v. Supreme Merchandise Co.United States Customs Court · 1962
- Luria Steel & Trading Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1959
- United States v. F. W. Myers & Co.United States Customs Court · 1969
- Hub Floral Manufacturing Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1969
- Fashion Ribbon Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1967
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Moss Manufacturing Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1989
- Bud Berman Sportswear, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1972
- Rattancraft of California v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1972
- Schieffelin & Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1974
- Schieffelin & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1973