Legal Opinion

Schieffelin & Co. v. United States

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided November 7, 1974No. 74-16, C.A.D. 1135PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Lane, Juclge.

This appeal is from the judgment of tbe United States Customs Court, First Division, Appellate Term, 71 Cust. Ct. 209, A.R.D. 317, 360 F. Supp. 1386 (1973), affirming tbe judgment of a single judge sitting reappraisement, 67 Cust. 'Ct. 549, R.D. 11759 (1971). The parties agree that export value, as defined in section 402(b) of tbe *8Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19 U8C 1401a (b),1 is the proper basis for valuation, and the sole controversy now is over the inclusion of a $2.00 per case “advertising allowance” in arriving at export value. The trial court and the Appellate Term held…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. United States v. Josef Mfg., Ltd.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1972
  2. Norco Sales Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1970
  3. Bud Berman Sportswear, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1972
  4. Schieffelin & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1973

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Carmichael International Service v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1977
  2. Kurt Orban Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1978
  3. Veterans Administration Hospital v. U. S. Department of CommerceCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1978

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API