Legal Opinion
Roe v. Hamilton County Department of Human Services
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided July 6, 1988No. C-870506PublishedCited by 31 opinions
1Per curiam
This cause came on to be heard upon an appeal from the Court of Common Pleas of Hamilton County, Ohio.
Jane Roe and Sally Doe (appellants) are pseudonyms for two minor children who were placed in the custody of the Hamilton County Department of Human Services (“HCDHS”) by order of the Juvenile Division of the Court of Common Pleas of Hamilton County. Each of the girls, through her next friend, filed a complaint against HCDHS; the Hamilton County Commissioners, individually (Joseph DeCourcy, Norman Murdock and Robert Taft II); Seth Staples, the Director of HCDHS; Gabriel Blumer, the Director of…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Mitchell v. ForsythSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Daniels v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Ingraham v. WrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- Conley v. ShearerOhio Supreme Court · 1992
- Cook v. City of CincinnatiOhio Court of Appeals · 1995
- Pelletier v. Campbell (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2018
- Nease v. Medical College HospitalsOhio Supreme Court · 1992
- Allied Erecting & Dismantling Co. v. City of YoungstownOhio Court of Appeals · 2002
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.