Legal Opinion

Sylvester v. Pierce County

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided February 10, 2009No. 37282-7-IIPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHoughton, J.

¶1 Edward Becker and Theodore and Michelle Collins appeal the superior court’s reversal of the Pierce County hearing examiner’s decision granting them a reasonable use exception and allowing them to build single family residences on their property. Becker and the Collinses argue that they are entitled to a reasonable use exception because the lots were vested by March 1, 2005, as required by Pierce County Code (PCC) 18E.20.050(C)(2)(a), and there is no evidence that they divided the lots and created their own hardship. Because the superior court *816correctly found that Becker’s and the…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Waste Management of Seattle, Inc. v. Utilities & Transportation CommissionWashington Supreme Court · 1994
  2. State v. JohnsonWashington Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Port of Seattle v. Pollution Control Hearings BoardWashington Supreme Court · 2004
  4. In Re RosierWashington Supreme Court · 1986
  5. Rhod-A-Zalea & 35th, Inc. v. Snohomish CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1998

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Kelly v. Chelan CountyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2010
  2. Kelly v. COUNTY OF CHELANCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2010
  3. GOAT HILL HOMEOWNERS ASS'N, INC. v. King CountyDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API