McGraw-Hill, Inc. v. Futrell
Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION ON MOTION FOR REHEARING
O’CONNOR, Justice.
The primary issue before this Court is whether a defendant was properly served before a default judgment was entered. We find that it was not, and we reverse.
On motion for rehearing, we deny the motion, withdraw our opinion issued on December 5, 1991, and issue this corrected opinion in its stead.
Fact summary
Charles Futrell, the appellee, sued McGraw-Hill Book Company, A Division of McGraw-Hill, Inc., and Lance E. Walters, the appellants (collectively “McGraw”), for tortious interference with contractual and business relations, conspiracy,…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Wilson v. DunnTexas Supreme Court · 1991
- Uvalde Country Club v. Martin Linen Supply Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1985
- City of Houston v. QuinonesTexas Supreme Court · 1944
- Hopkins v. Spring Independent School Dist.Texas Supreme Court · 1987
- City of Houston v. QuinonesCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1943
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by46 opinions
- Barker CATV Construction, Inc. v. Ampro, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1999
- Benefit Planners, L.L.P. v. RenCare, Ltd., Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2002
- Faggett v. Hargrove, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1995
- Myan Management Group, L.L.C. v. Adam Sparks Family Revocable Trust, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2009
- Seib v. Bekker, Texas Court of Appeals, 12th District (Tyler)1997
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.