Legal Opinion

Seib v. Bekker

Texas Court of Appeals, 12th District (Tyler)

Decided June 30, 1997No. 12-95-00106-CVPublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HADDEN, Justice.

This is an appeal from a default judgment in a vehicle collision case. Raymond R. Bekker and Lucille Bekker, Individually, and Raymond R. Bekker, Independent Administrator of the Estate of Terry Ray Bekker, Deceased, (“the Bekkers”) brought suit against Richard P. Seib (“Seib”) and others alleging that the defendants were liable for the death of their son, and seeking survival and wrongful death damages. For reasons not material to our holding today, Seib did not answer the suit nor make any appearance in the case. 1 Upon receiving notice of the default judgment, Seib timely…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Craddock v. Sunshine Bus Lines, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1939
  2. Primate Construction, Inc. v. SilverTexas Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Wilson v. DunnTexas Supreme Court · 1991
  4. Uvalde Country Club v. Martin Linen Supply Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1985
  5. Finlay v. JonesTexas Supreme Court · 1968

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Dawson v. BriggsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2003
  2. Dolly v. Aethos Communications Systems, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2000
  3. Frazier v. Dikovitsky, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2004
  4. Laas v. Williamson, Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)2005
  5. 14.9 Grams of Methamphetamine v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2000

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API