Legal Opinion

Kalik v. Allis-Chalmers Corp.

District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Decided April 15, 1987No. Civ. A. 86-966PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

TEITELBAUM, District Judge.

This is an action by the owners of a site contaminated by hazardous substances against the manufacturers and suppliers of the products containing the hazardous substances to recover clean-up costs and damages under the Comprehensive Environmental Response Compensation and Liability Act of 1980 (CERCLA) and under state law.

The action was brought by the Kaliks (IT 1.1, 1.2), 1 , the owners of a site (f 1.3) from which plaintiff Ben Kalik operated the Swissvale Auto Surplus Parts Company (SASPC) (¶ 1.3-1.4), a scrap metal business. There are 27…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Romero v. International Terminal Operating Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1959
  3. The State of New York v. Shore Realty Corp. And Donald LeograndeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1985
  4. Berkebile v. Brantly Helicopter Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  5. Azzarello v. Black Bros. Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Monsanto Co. v. ReedKentucky Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Prudential Insurance Co. of America v. United States GypsumDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1989
  3. Loughlin v. United StatesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2002
  4. High v. Westinghouse Elec. Corp.Supreme Court of Florida · 1993
  5. Donoughe v. Lincoln Electric Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2007

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API