City of Seattle v. Holifield
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the CourtLeach, J.
¶1 This case addresses whether suppression of evidence is an available remedy under CrRLJ 8.3(b) and whether the prosecution may obtain a writ of review to correct errors of law made by a court of limited jurisdiction. We hold suppression of evidence is not an available remedy under CrRLJ 8.3(b). We also hold that the writ is available to correct errors of law and that the superior court erred in denying the writ. Therefore, we reverse.
Background
¶2 In 2008, respondents Matthew Jacob and Jacob Culley were each arrested and charged with driving while under the influence of alcohol (DUI). Each…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- United States v. MorrisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- State v. AzpitarteWashington Supreme Court · 2000
- State v. AzpitarteWashington Supreme Court · 2000
- City of Fircrest v. JensenWashington Supreme Court · 2006
- State v. HutchinsonWashington Supreme Court · 1989
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- City of Seattle v. HolifieldWashington Supreme Court · 2010
- City of Seattle v. HolifieldWashington Supreme Court · 2010
- State v. MashekCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2013
- State v. RosalezCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2010
- State v. RosalezCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2010
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.