Legal Opinion

Boston, Worcester & New York Street Railway Co. v. Commonwealth

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided October 25, 1938PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtQua, J.

This is a petition to recover against the Commonwealth the sum of $363,306 and interest alleged to be due under a purported contract in writing between the petitioner and the Commonwealth bearing date April 11, 1932.

The alleged contract is executed in behalf of the Commonwealth by the department of public works. It recites that the department has laid out and taken charge of “the Worcester Turnpike, so called,” in Framingham, Natick, Wellesley and Newton, and contemplates the laying out and taking charge of an extension easterly into the town of Brookline; that the “Company” (petitioner) has…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Burgess v. Mayor of BrocktonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1920
  2. Attorney General v. Metropolitan RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1878
  3. Board of Survey v. Bay State Street Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1916
  4. Selectmen of Amesbury v. Citizens Electric Street Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1908
  5. City of Springfield v. Springfield Street Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1902

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. United Electric Light Co. v. Deliso Construction Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1943
  2. Boston Elevated Railway Co. v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1942
  3. City of Newton v. Department of Public UtilitiesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1959
  4. First Nat. Bank of Boston v. Maine Turnpike Auth.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1957
  5. Nichols v. Commissioner of Public WelfareMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1942

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API