Legal Opinion

Andreatta v. Hunley

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided July 27, 1999No. 43A04-9806-CV-328Published

1Opinion of the Court

714 N.E.2d 1154 (1999)

Patricia and Livio ANDREATTA, Appellants-Plaintiffs,

v.

Wayne and Virginia HUNLEY, Appellees-Defendants.

No. 43A04-9806-CV-328.

Court of Appeals of Indiana.

July 27, 1999.

Craig A. Rieff, Robert F. Gonderman, Jr., Gonderman Legal Corporation, P.C., South Bend, Indiana, Attorneys for Appellants.

Millard P. Plumlee, Lemon, Armey, Hearn & Leininger, Warsaw, Indiana, Attorney for Appellees.

OPINION

MATTINGLY, Judge.

Patricia and Livio Andreatta appeal the denial of their motion to quash, motion for protective order, and motion for sanctions. We restate the issues presented for review…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Canfield v. SandockIndiana Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Collins v. BairIndiana Supreme Court · 1969
  3. Cua v. MorrisonIndiana Court of Appeals · 1993
  4. Bethlehem Steel Corp. v. Sercon Corp.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1995
  5. Owen v. OwenIndiana Supreme Court · 1990

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API