Legal Opinion

Hudson v. Cummard

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided June 13, 1934No. Civil No. 3462PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLockwood, J.

On December 19, 1933, Carroll Hudson, hereinafter called plaintiff, filed with this court an application for leave to prosecute an action in the nature of quo warranto against John Cummard, hereinafter called defendant. Leave was granted, and a citation issued to defendant to appear and answer the complaint. Defendant filed a general demurrer to the complaint together with an answer, and later, by stipulation, a statement of facts, and the matter was submitted on briefs.

There are a number of questions raised which allege defects in form rather than substance. We think it unnecessary to pass…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Allen v. StateArizona Supreme Court · 1913
  2. People ex rel. McKune v. WellerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1858
  3. State ex rel. McHenry v. JenkinsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1869
  4. Sawyer v. HaydonNevada Supreme Court · 1865
  5. People ex rel. Webster v. BabcockCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Bolin v. Superior CourtArizona Supreme Court · 1958
  2. Green v. OsborneArizona Supreme Court · 1988
  3. Estes v. State of ArizonaArizona Supreme Court · 1936
  4. Tucson Manor, Inc. v. Federal Nat. Mortgage Ass'nArizona Supreme Court · 1952
  5. Benson v. WilliamsNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1952

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API