Legal Opinion

Estes v. State of Arizona

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided June 17, 1936No. Criminal No. 832PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBoss, J.

The appellant, St. Louis Estes, was convicted of practicing the healing art without having obtained a certificate from the state board of examiners of the basic sciences. From snch conviction he has appealed, contending that there is no law in Arizona requiring that he obtain such a certificate in order to practice the healing art.

The legislature, at its regular session in 1933, enacted chapter 84, entitled:

“An act relating to the basic sciences; defining the same and creating a board of examiners therein; providing for the examination and registration of practitioners of the healing arts;…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Davis v. OsborneArizona Supreme Court · 1912
  2. Hudson v. CummardArizona Supreme Court · 1934
  3. State v. PughArizona Supreme Court · 1927

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Bolin v. Superior CourtArizona Supreme Court · 1958
  2. Town of Scottsdale v. State Ex Rel. PickrellCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1965
  3. Tucson Manor, Inc. v. Federal Nat. Mortgage Ass'nArizona Supreme Court · 1952
  4. Dewey v. JonesCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1989
  5. Searles v. StrauchCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API