Estes v. State of Arizona
Arizona Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtBoss, J.
The appellant, St. Louis Estes, was convicted of practicing the healing art without having obtained a certificate from the state board of examiners of the basic sciences. From snch conviction he has appealed, contending that there is no law in Arizona requiring that he obtain such a certificate in order to practice the healing art.
The legislature, at its regular session in 1933, enacted chapter 84, entitled:
“An act relating to the basic sciences; defining the same and creating a board of examiners therein; providing for the examination and registration of practitioners of the healing arts;…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- State ex rel. Davis v. OsborneArizona Supreme Court · 1912
- Hudson v. CummardArizona Supreme Court · 1934
- State v. PughArizona Supreme Court · 1927
3Cited by5 opinions
- Bolin v. Superior CourtArizona Supreme Court · 1958
- Town of Scottsdale v. State Ex Rel. PickrellCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1965
- Tucson Manor, Inc. v. Federal Nat. Mortgage Ass'nArizona Supreme Court · 1952
- Dewey v. JonesCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1989
- Searles v. StrauchCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1985