Legal Opinion
In Re Goldsbury
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided June 27, 1995No. 94-35158Published
1Opinion of the Court
57 F.3d 1077
NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.
In re John A. GOLDSBURY and Helen R. Goldsbury, husband and
wife, Debtors.
Robert SMART and Mary Ann Smart, husband and wife,
Plaintiffs-Appellants,
v.
John A. GOLDSBURY and Helen R. Goldsbury, husband and wife,
Defendants-Appellees.
No. 94-35158.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Argued and Submitted May 2, 1995.
Decided…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- McLINN v. FJORDCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
- Daniel Kimbro, Plaintiff-Appellant/cross-Appellee v. Atlantic Richfield Company, Defendant-Appellee/cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
- Paulson v. County of PierceWashington Supreme Court · 1983
- Cheesman v. SathreWashington Supreme Court · 1954
- Dunn v. ZimmermanOhio Supreme Court · 1994
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.