Legal Opinion

Neufeld v. Mid-Continent Casualty Co.

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided May 9, 1964No. 43,764PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Parker, C. J.:

This is an appeal from a judgment of the district court denying a lump sum judgment and related relief in a workmen’s compensation case.

The facts are not in dispute. The issues involve procedural facts which will be presented in detail.

The plaintiff was injured on October 10,1961, while in the course of his employment by one R. W. Scott. The Mid-Continent Casualty Company was Scott’s workmen’s compensation insurer.

On April 26, 1962, an examiner for the Workmen’s Compensation Director made an award which reads in part:

“Wherefore, Award of…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Fleming v. National Cash Register Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1961
  2. Anderson v. CarderSupreme Court of Kansas · 1944
  3. Miller v. Massman Construction Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1951
  4. Sisk v. EdmonstonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1947
  5. Newsome v. AndersonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1947

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Casebeer v. Alliance Mutual Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1969
  2. Griffith v. State Highway Commission of KansasSupreme Court of Kansas · 1969
  3. Casebeer v. Alliance Mutual Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1969
  4. Casebeer v. Alliance Mutual Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1969
  5. Griffith v. State Highway Commission of KansasSupreme Court of Kansas · 1969

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API