Legal Opinion

Griffith v. State Highway Commission of Kansas

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided June 14, 1969No. 45,613PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by Fatzer, J.:

This case arises out of a workmens compensation proceeding. The plaintiff has appealed from the order of the district court sustaining his motion for summary judgment in an amount less than the amount he sought to recover in an action commenced pursuant to K. S. A. 44-512a.

On or about November 15, 1962, the claimant sustained personal injury by accident which arose out of and in the course of his employment. He timely commenced a proceeding before the workmens compensation director, and his claim, like Rip VanWinkle, lay peacefully sleeping…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Fleming v. National Cash Register Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1961
  2. Miller v. Massman Construction Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1951
  3. Casebeer v. Alliance Mutual Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1969
  4. Scammahorn v. Gibraltar Savings & Loan Assn.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1965
  5. Shinkle v. State Highway CommissionSupreme Court of Kansas · 1968

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance v. TreadwellCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1971
  2. Crow v. City of WichitaSupreme Court of Kansas · 1977
  3. Kissick v. Salina Manufacturing Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1970
  4. Boyd v. Yellow Freight Systems, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1974
  5. Acosta v. National Beef Packing Co., L.P.Supreme Court of Kansas · 2002

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API