Legal Opinion

Millhaubt v. McKee

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided January 26, 1935No. 31,977PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Smith, J.:

This is an action in which the county commissioners of Sedgwick county ask a writ of mandamus to compel the county treasurer to disburse certain tax money that was paid under protest and to compel defendant railroads to withdraw their protests. Judgment was for plaintiffs. Defendants appeal.

The taxes involved are those payable in December, 1933. The action arises on account of a dispute about which tax limitation statute controls. The levy which is attacked here was 4.5 mills in the aggregate. Defendant railway companies paid such of their…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. In re HallSupreme Court of Kansas · 1888
  2. State ex rel. Amick v. FranciscoSupreme Court of Kansas · 1916
  3. State ex rel. Mellott v. McCombsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1928
  4. City of Topeka v. McCabeSupreme Court of Kansas · 1909
  5. Hibbard v. BarkerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1911

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Kansas Gas & Electric Co. v. DaltonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1935
  2. Spalding v. PriceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1972
  3. Weyerhaeuser Timber Co. v. School District No. 118Washington Supreme Court · 1941
  4. Kansas City Southern Railway Co. v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Kansas · 1958
  5. Kansas City Southern Railway Co. v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Kansas · 1958

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API