Great Western P. Co. v. City of Oakland
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
RICHARDS, J., pro tem
this appeal is from a judgment in favor of the defendant, a general demurrer to the complaint as amended having been sustained. The action was one brought by the plaintiff to recover certain taxes paid by it, under protest, to the defendant.
The complaint alleged that the defendant was and is a corporation engaged in the transmission and sale of electricity, and in the sale of steam for heat as a by-product of its said business of transmitting and selling electricity. That during the year 1919 the plaintiff owned and operated in the city of Oakland a certain steam heating…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Pullman Co. v. RichardsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
- Lake Tahoe Ry. & Transp. Co. v. RobertsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1914
- Southern Pacific Co. v. RichardsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
- Pacific Electric Ry. Co. v. RolkinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
3Cited by8 opinions
- Hopkins v. Southern California Telephone Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1928
- San Francisco-Oakland Terminal Railways v. JohnsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1930
- Morgan Adams, Inc. v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1930
- Third & Broadway Building Co. v. Southern California Edison Co.California Court of Appeal · 1933
- Great Western Power Co. v. City of OaklandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.