Pacific Electric Ry. Co. v. Rolkin
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
The city assessor of Los Angeles did not file any protest against the taxation of the property in question as operative property of the Pacific Electric Railway Company until more than thirty days after he had received the copy of the company's report which the law requires to be served upon him. The provision of the statute (Stats. 1911, p. 538) that such protest shall be filed within thirty days thereafter is jurisdictional. A protest filed later has no effect, and does not require the state board to revise or alter its action in placing such property on the roll as operative property, or…
2Cited by3 opinions
- Great Western P. Co. v. City of OaklandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
- Great Western Power Co. v. City of OaklandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
- Nevada-California Power Co. v. BorlandCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1926