Legal Opinion

Pacific Electric Ry. Co. v. Rolkin

California Supreme Court

Decided November 13, 1912No. L.A. No. 3345PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The city assessor of Los Angeles did not file any protest against the taxation of the property in question as operative property of the Pacific Electric Railway Company until more than thirty days after he had received the copy of the company's report which the law requires to be served upon him. The provision of the statute (Stats. 1911, p. 538) that such protest shall be filed within thirty days thereafter is jurisdictional. A protest filed later has no effect, and does not require the state board to revise or alter its action in placing such property on the roll as operative property, or…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Great Western P. Co. v. City of OaklandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
  2. Great Western Power Co. v. City of OaklandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
  3. Nevada-California Power Co. v. BorlandCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1926

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API