Legal Opinion
Monolithic Power Systems, Inc. v. 02 Micro International Ltd.
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided August 13, 2013No. 2012-1221PublishedCited by 42 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PROST, Circuit Judge.
02 Micro International Ltd. (“02 Micro”) appeals from the decision of the United States District Court for the Northern District of California finding this case exceptional under 35 U.S.C. § 285 and awarding attorney fees and costs to Monolithic Power Systems, Inc. (“MPS”), and ASUSTeK Computer, Inc. and ASUSTeK Computer International (collectively, “ASUSTeK”). See Monolithic Power Sys., Inc. v. 02 Micro Int’l Ltd., No. 08-4567, 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 154454 (N.D.Cal. Mar. 3, 2011) (“Exceptional Case Order ”); Monolithic Power Sys., Inc. v. 02 Micro Int’l Ltd., No.…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Fox v. ViceSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
- Professional Real Estate Investors, Inc. v. Columbia Pictures Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Molins Plc, and John Coventry Smith, Jr. v. Textron, Inc., Kearney & Trecker Corporation, and Avco CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
- Brooks Furniture Manufacturing, Inc. v. Dutailier International, Inc. And Dutailier, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2005
- Brasseler, U.S.A. I, L.P. v. Stryker Sales Corporation and Stryker CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2001
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by42 opinions
- Sfa Systems, LLC v. Newegg Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2015
- Rembrandt Techs., LP v. Comcast of Fla./Pa., LP (In Re Rembrandt Techs. LP)Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2018
- Kilopass Technology, Inc. v. Sidense CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2013
- Gaymar Industries, Inc. v. Cincinnati Sub-Zero Products, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2015
- Iris Connex, LLC v. Dell, Inc.District Court, E.D. Texas · 2017
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.