Legal Opinion

Kilopass Technology, Inc. v. Sidense Corporation

Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Decided December 26, 2013No. 2013-1193PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion for the court filed by Circuit Judge O’MALLEY.

Concurring opinion filed by Chief Judge RADER.

O’MALLEY, Circuit Judge.

This appeal arises from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California. The district court granted summary judgment in favor of Sidense Corporation (“Sidense”), holding that it did not infringe Kilopass Technology, Inc.’s (“Kilopass’s”) U.S. Patents 6,940,751 (“the '751 patent”), 6,777,757, and 6,856,540. Kilopass Tech., Inc. v. Sidense Corp., No. 10-2066, 2012 WL 3545286 (N.D.Cal. Aug. 16, 2012). We summarily affirmed that decision under…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. United States v. United States Gypsum Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948
  2. Chambers v. Nasco, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
  3. Grogan v. GarnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  4. Addington v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  5. Fogerty v. Fantasy, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1994

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. Octane Fitness, LLC v. Icon HealthSupreme Court of the United States · 2014
  2. Octane Fitness, LLC v. ICON Health & Fitness, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2014
  3. Sfa Systems, LLC v. Newegg Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2015
  4. Federal Trade Commission v. AbbVie IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2020
  5. Skyline Steel, LLC v. PilePro, LLCDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2015

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API