Legal Opinion
Carhal Factors, Inc. v. Salkind
Supreme Court of New Jersey
Decided November 6, 1950PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Case, J.
The appeal (B. 8. 2:40-25) was to the Appellate Division from a money judgment in the amount of $6,451.42 entered in the Superior Court, Law Division, Hudson County, on an award by arbitrators, and is certified to us on our own motion. Plaintiff, Carhal Factors, Inc., brought an action at law under a complaint containing four counts of which the first and second were against Leon Salkind, Anne Salkind, Max Muehlfriedel, Hildegarde Muehlfriedel, Harold Baum and Marion Baum, individually, jointly, severally, or in the alternative, as co-partners,…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- City of Omaha v. Omaha Water Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1910
- Lutz v. LinthicumSupreme Court of the United States · 1834
- Rosenbaum v. DruckerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1943
- Ex parte RogersNew York Supreme Court · 1827
- Lyle v. RodgersSupreme Court of the United States · 1820
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Daly v. Komline-Sanderson Engineering Corp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1963
- Wm. J. Burns, Etc., Inc. v. NJ Guards Union, Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1960
- La Stella v. Garcia EstatesSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1975
- Creter v. DaviesNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1954
- Collingswood Hosiery Mills, Inc. v. Am. Fed. Hosiery WorkersNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1953
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.