Legal Opinion

Anderson v. Chrysler Corp.

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided May 7, 1991No. Docket 119530PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

Defendant appeals by leave granted from an order of the Workers’ Compensation Appeal Board, which found that plaintiff had a continuing partial disability based on a skin condition of his hands. We reverse and remand.

Plaintiff started working for defendant in September, 1972. For about two years his duties involved applying oil to regulators. While performing this job, plaintiff began experiencing skin problems. According to plaintiff, he experienced skin eruptions whenever he worked with oil or grease, but the eruptions would subside when he was not exposed to these substances. Plaintiff…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Kostamo v. Marquette Iron Mining Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Aquilina v. General Motors Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Carter v. General Motors Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1960
  4. Dressler v. Grand Rapids Die Casting Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1978
  5. Nezdropa v. Wayne CountyMichigan Court of Appeals · 1986

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Rakestraw v. General Dynamics Land Systems, IncMichigan Supreme Court · 2003
  2. Drouillard v. Stroh Brewery Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1993
  3. Rakestraw v. General Dynamics Land Systems, IncMichigan Supreme Court · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API