Legal Opinion
Zero Manufacturing Co. v. Husch
Missouri Court of Appeals
Decided November 3, 1987No. 52003PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GARY M. GAERTNER, Presiding Judge.
Appellant Zero Manufacturing Company (Zero) appeals from the order of the lower court dismissing its first amended petition. Finding the claims set forth in the petition are barred by the applicable statute of limitations, we affirm.
On October 19, 1983, Zero filed its original petition against respondents, partners in the law firm known as Husch, Eppenber-ger, Donohue, Elson and Comfeld. In the petition, Zero made the following allegations: Zero employed respondents as its attorneys, and in January 1975 Zero entered into a contract with Svanoe, which contract…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Jepson v. StubbsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1977
- Thatcher v. De TarSupreme Court of Missouri · 1943
- Dixon v. ShaftonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1983
- Hall v. SmithSupreme Court of Missouri · 1962
- Heitman v. Brown Group, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1982
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Klemme v. BestSupreme Court of Missouri · 1997
- Joyce v. Armstrong Teasdale, LLPCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2011
- R.D.H. Communications, Ltd. v. WinstonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1997
- Best Choice Fund, LLC v. Low & Childers, P.C.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2012
- M & D ENTERPRISES, INC. v. WolffMissouri Court of Appeals · 1996
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.