Legal Opinion

Armstrong v. Pickett

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided November 30, 1993No. 93-91PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CARDINE, Justice.

Appellant, Arthur M. Armstrong (Armstrong), sued his former attorney, Robert J. Pickett (Pickett), to recover part of the fee he paid Pickett to defend him in a criminal action. The trial court awarded judgment to Pickett. Armstrong appeals, asserting he was improperly denied a jury trial, that the trial court improperly admitted certain documents, and that insufficient evidence was presented to support the judgment.

We affirm.

Armstrong presents three issues:

Did the district court abuse its discretion in not relieving appellant from waiver of jury trial under Rule 38 W.R.C.P.

Di…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. LP v. Natrona County Department of Public Assistance & Social ServicesWyoming Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Oukrop v. WasserburgerWyoming Supreme Court · 1988
  3. Waggoner v. General Motors Corp.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1989
  4. Osborn v. Pine Mountain RanchWyoming Supreme Court · 1989

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Willowbrook Ranch, Inc. v. Nugget Exploration, Inc.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Megan B. Golden, f/k/a/ Megan B. Guion v. Todd A. GuionWyoming Supreme Court · 2013
  3. G.C.I., Inc. v. HaughtWyoming Supreme Court · 2000
  4. Chancler v. MeredithWyoming Supreme Court · 2004
  5. Brendon A. Boyce v. Julie A. Jarvis, f/k/a Julie A. BoyceWyoming Supreme Court · 2021

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API