Unisys Medical Plan v. Gary Timm and Kandis Timm
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
TERENCE T. EVANS, Circuit Judge.
After Gary and Kandis Timm settled a state court personal injury case, the Unisys Medical Plan, a self-funded employee welfare benefit plan governed by the Employee Retirement Security Act (ERISA), 29 U.S.C. § 1001 et seq., sued the Timms in federal court, seeking reimbursement of medical expenses it paid on Mr. Timm’s behalf. After Unisys moved for summary judgment, the Timms moved to stay the federal case, arguing that it should be put on ice while the state court ease was still active. The Timms also raised the affirmative defenses of waiver and estoppel…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- United States v. OlanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Northern States Power Co. v. BugherWisconsin Supreme Court · 1995
- Gies v. Nissen Corp.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1973
- Heggy v. GrutznerCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1990
- Jasper Cabinet Company v. United Steelworkers Of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1996
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Administrative Committee, as Administrator of the Associates' Health and Welfare Plan v. Patricia A. GaufCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1999
- Marshall v. Inn on Madeline IslandCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2001
- Cooperative Benefit Administrators, Inc. v. WhittleDistrict Court, M.D. Alabama · 1997
- Engle v. Wal-Mart Associates Health & Welfare PlanDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 1999
- Mull v. Motion Picture Industry Health PlanDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2012
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.