Legal Opinion

Noaimi v. Zaid

District Court, D. Kansas

Decided May 17, 2012No. 11-1156-EFMPublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

KAREN M. HUMPHREYS, United States Magistrate Judge.

This matter is before the court on the parties’ respective motions to compel discov*640ery (Doc. 36 & 38). The rulings are set forth below.

Background1

This ease springs from complex business relationships between plaintiffs and defendants concerning chemicals used in the oil production industry. Highly summarized, Nuaman resides in Bahrain and Nader resides in Saudi Arabia.2 Zaid and defendants’ chemical manufacturing facilities are currently located in Kansas. Beginning in 1997, the parties discussed and exchanged proposals…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Resolution Trust Corp. v. Deloitte & ToucheDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 1992
  2. American Maplan Corp. v. HeilmayrDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2001
  3. Ice Corp. v. Hamilton Sundstrand Corp.District Court, D. Kansas · 2007
  4. American Maplan Corp. v. HeilmayrDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2002

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Federal Deposit Insurance v. McCaffreeDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2012
  2. Ainstein AI, Inc. v. ADAC Plastics, Inc.District Court, D. Kansas · 2023
  3. Edalati v. SabharwalDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2020
  4. Laber v. United States Department of DefenseDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2021
  5. Martley v. Basehor, Kansas, City ofDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2021

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API