Legal Opinion
Ice Corp. v. Hamilton Sundstrand Corp.
District Court, D. Kansas
Decided August 22, 2007No. 05-4135-JARPublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
SEBELIUS, United States Magistrate Judge.
This matter comes before the court upon plaintiffs Renewed Motion to Compel Defendants to Execute Business Records Releases Directed to Artus and Airbus (Doc. 297). Defendants have filed a response (Doc. 310) to which plaintiff has replied (Doc. 321). Accordingly, the court finds this motion ripe for disposition. As detailed below, the court grants in part and denies in part the present motion.
I. Background
In 2004, Hamilton Sundstrand and Ratier-Figeac, a French corporation and a subsidiary of Hamilton’s parent company United…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Hickman v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Societe Internationale Pour Participations Industrielles Et Commerciales, S. A. v. RogersSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Bank of New York v. Meridien BIAO Bank Tanzania Ltd.District Court, S.D. New York · 1997
- Compagnie Francaise d'Assurance Pour le Commerce Exterieur v. Phillips Petroleum Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1984
- Pulsecard, Inc. v. Discover Card Services, Inc.District Court, D. Kansas · 1996
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Goodman v. Praxair Services, Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 2009
- Federal Deposit Insurance v. McCaffreeDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2012
- In Re LozanoUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 2008
- Noaimi v. ZaidDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2012
- Terrell v. Internal Revenue Service (In re Terrell)United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 2017
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.