Legal Opinion
Burgess v. Vanguard Insurance
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided January 24, 1984No. 11384PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Per curiam
This action involves a claim, in six counts, by the owners of real property against their fire insurance carrier. In the fourth count of the complaint the plaintiffs allege that the defendant has engaged in an unfair trade practice in violation of General Statutes § 38-61 and that such conduct violates the provisions of § 42-110b (a) (Connecticut Unfair Trade Practices Act — CUTPA). The defendant, pursuant to Practice Book § 147, filed a request that the plaintiffs revise their complaint by separating the fourth count into two separate counts. The court, Cretella, J., overruled the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Bridgeport Hydraulic Co. v. PearsonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1952
- Veits v. City of HartfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1948
- State v. KempSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1938
- Gallo v. G. Fox & Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1961
- Rodriguez v. Mallory Battery Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Buckman v. People Express, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
- Zapata v. BurnsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
- Hall v. BurnsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
- Duhaime v. American Reserve Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1986
- Fuessenich v. DiNardoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.