Legal Opinion

Graff v. Kinney

New York Supreme Court

Decided December 15, 1884PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrown, J.

— The complaint in this action alleges that the note sued on was made by the defendants under their firm name of J. P. Kinney & Co.; that the defendants are husband and wife and that the materials for which said note was given were furnished for and benefited the separate estate of the wife.

It is not alleged that Mrs. Kinney personally signed the note, and her individual name does not appear on it. She cannot therefore be made liable upon it unless the signature John P. Kinney & Co. is sufficient to bind her, and this depends on the further question whether there was a valid partnership…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Coleman v. . BurrNew York Court of Appeals · 1883
  2. Knapp v. . SmithNew York Court of Appeals · 1863
  3. Owen v. . CawleyNew York Court of Appeals · 1867
  4. Bodine v. . KilleenNew York Court of Appeals · 1873
  5. Boynton v. . AndrewsNew York Court of Appeals · 1875

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In re GroveNew York Surrogate's Court · 1888
  2. Woodman v. PenfieldNew York Supreme Court · 1889

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API