Legal Opinion

Rose v. Allied Development Co.

Utah Supreme Court

Decided May 13, 1986No. 19488PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOWE, Justice:

Plaintiff Willard S. Rose appeals from a summary judgment in favor of defendant.

Plaintiff was hired by defendant Allied Development Company in August of 1981 as assistant manager of the shoe department of its Murray stpre, pursuant to an oral employment agreement for an indefinite term. Several months later, in January of 1982, plaintiff’s job requirements were increased, and he became responsible for the shoe departments in other stores as well. Sometime between March and June of 1982, Allied promoted him to the position of manager of the shoe department, and he was required to…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Perry v. SindermannSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Thompson v. St. Regis Paper CompanyWashington Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Bowen v. Riverton CityUtah Supreme Court · 1982
  4. Lasser v. Grunbaum Bros. Furniture Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1955
  5. Bihlmaier v. CarsonUtah Supreme Court · 1979

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Berube v. Fashion Centre, Ltd.Utah Supreme Court · 1989
  2. Brehany v. Nordstrom, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Johnson v. Morton Thiokol, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 1991
  4. Nunley v. Westates Casing Services, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 1999
  5. Hodgson v. Bunzl Utah, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 1992

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API