Legal Opinion

In Re Meyer & Judd

District Court, W.D. Tennessee

Decided April 22, 1924No. 5157PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ROSS, District Judge.

This case is before .the court on a petition to review the action of the referee, wherein questions presented by the" pleadings were determined by him. A very full and able- opinion has been filed herein by the referee, in which all the matters presented for consideration are fully discussed and are definitely decided.

A consideration of the record discloses that the questions of fact as found by the referee are well supported, and, being fully satisfied as to his conclusions thereon and his construction of the law, his opinion is adopted and .made the opinion of this…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Maverick Mills v. DavisDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1923
  2. Kansas City Structural Steel Co. v. State ex rel. Ashley CountySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1923

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Hord v. National Homeopathic HospitalDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1952
  2. Butler v. EllisCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1930
  3. In Re Schulte-UnitedCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1932
  4. In re Mill Iron Const. Co.District Court, N.D. New York · 1932
  5. In re Richards & Holloway, Inc.District Court, W.D. Louisiana · 1940

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API