Legal Opinion

United States v. Westinghouse Electric Corporation

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided April 14, 1986No. 85-3456. Misc. 11710PublishedCited by 50 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

ADAMS, Circuit Judge.

Under a 1982 statute, the Inspector General of the Department of Defense (Inspector General) is charged with combating fraud, waste, and abuse. To discharge that duty, Congress gave the Inspector General broad subpoena power. This appeal, presenting an issue of first impression in the appellate courts, requires us to consider the contours of that power.

At the request of a separate auditing agency within the Department of Defense, the Inspector General issued a subpoena for internal audit reports of Westinghouse Electric Corporation (Westinghouse).…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Pullman-Standard v. SwintSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. United States v. PowellSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  3. United States v. Morton Salt Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
  4. Oklahoma Press Publishing Co. v. WallingSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  5. United States v. Arthur Young & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by50 opinions

  1. National Labor Relations Board v. Gary Frazier, an IndividualCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1992
  2. Medical Arts Clinic, P.C. v. Franciscan Initiatives, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Burlington Northern R. Co. v. Office of Inspector General, R.R. Retirement Bd.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1993
  4. United States v. Aero Mayflower Transit Co., Inc., Global Van Lines, IncCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1987
  5. United States v. Stephen B. ComleyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1989

45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API