Gordon v. Maupin
Missouri Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
CLEMENS, Commissioner.
The issue here: Does the other-insurance-available clause in plaintiff’s uninsured motorist policy preclude recovery when the other insurance was not actually available to her? We say no and affirm plaintiff’s $5,000 judgment against her insurer, defendant American Family Mutual Insurance Company (American).
American wrote two similar public automobile liability policies, one to plaintiff Marjorie Gordon and the other to her sister-in-law Phyllis Gordon. Each policy gave $5,000-$10,000 limit uninsured motor vehicle coverages. 1
On February 11, 1965 plaintiff was one of…
Also in this document: Per curiam.
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Horne v. Superior Life Insurance CompanySupreme Court of Virginia · 1962
- Brugioni v. Maryland Casualty CompanySupreme Court of Missouri · 1964
- MFA Mutual Ins. Co. v. WallaceSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1968
- Maryland Casualty Co. v. HoweSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1965
- Burcham v. Farmers Insurance ExchangeSupreme Court of Iowa · 1963
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Bradley v. Mid-Century InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1980
- Benzer v. Iowa Mutual Tornado Insurance Ass'nSupreme Court of Iowa · 1974
- Galloway v. Farmers Insurance Company, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1975
- Narron v. Cincinnati InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 2004
- Auto-Owners Insurance v. LeefersMichigan Court of Appeals · 1993
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.