Campanaro v. Pennsylvania Electric Co.
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
HOFFMAN, Judge:
This is an appeal from the March 8, 1994 order granting appellee’s, Pennsylvania Electric Company [“Penelec”], preliminary objections and thereby dismissing appellants’ complaint. Appellants, twenty-one female employees, present the following issue for our review:
I. Whether the lower court erred by concluding that a union is an indispensable party to a claim for sexual discrimination by union members against their employer where the *521only relief sought is an equalization of pay increases from the employer?
Appellants Brief at 4. For the following reasons, we reverse and remand.
App…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Sprague v. CaseySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
- Lorraine Evans v. Sheraton Park Hotel Lorraine Evans v. Sheraton Park Hotel, Hotel & Restaurant Employees and Bartenders International UnionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1974
- Mechanicsburg Area School District v. KlineSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
- Kryeski v. Schott Glass Technologies, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
- Enza, Inc. v. We the People, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1993
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Bailey v. StorlazziSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
- Imler v. Hollidaysburg American Legion Ambulance ServiceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
- Campanaro v. Pennsylvania Electric Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
- Smith v. Central Dauphin School DistrictDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2005
- Waklet-Riker v. Sayre Area Education Ass'nSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.