Legal Opinion

Campanaro v. Pennsylvania Electric Co.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided February 10, 1995PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOFFMAN, Judge:

This is an appeal from the March 8, 1994 order granting appellee’s, Pennsylvania Electric Company [“Penelec”], preliminary objections and thereby dismissing appellants’ complaint. Appellants, twenty-one female employees, present the following issue for our review:

I. Whether the lower court erred by concluding that a union is an indispensable party to a claim for sexual discrimination by union members against their employer where the *521only relief sought is an equalization of pay increases from the employer?

Appellants Brief at 4. For the following reasons, we reverse and remand.

App…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Sprague v. CaseySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  2. Lorraine Evans v. Sheraton Park Hotel Lorraine Evans v. Sheraton Park Hotel, Hotel & Restaurant Employees and Bartenders International UnionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1974
  3. Mechanicsburg Area School District v. KlineSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  4. Kryeski v. Schott Glass Technologies, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
  5. Enza, Inc. v. We the People, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1993

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Bailey v. StorlazziSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
  2. Imler v. Hollidaysburg American Legion Ambulance ServiceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
  3. Campanaro v. Pennsylvania Electric Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
  4. Smith v. Central Dauphin School DistrictDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2005
  5. Waklet-Riker v. Sayre Area Education Ass'nSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1995

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API