Smith v. Central Dauphin School District
District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
RAMBO, District Judge.
Before the court is Defendants’ motion to dismiss. (Doc. 7.) The parties have briefed the issues, and the matter is ripe for disposition. For the reasons that follow, Defendants’ motion will be Granted in part and Denied in part.
I. Background
Plaintiff Vickie Smith is a teacher in the Central Dauphin School District (“School District”). (Am.CompLt 1.) In 2001, Plaintiff began to experience health problems. (Id. ¶ 9.) During the course of investigating the cause of her health problems, Plaintiff became aware that mold in the School District’s buildings was having…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Kentucky v. GrahamSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Mt. Healthy City School District Board of Education v. DoyleSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Bell v. Lackawanna CountyDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2012
- Moffitt v. Tunkhannock Area School DistrictDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2016
- Whitfield v. Chartiers Valley School DistrictDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2010
- Todora v. BuskirkCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
- Allison Korman v. Trooper Nicholas Scochin, et al.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2026
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.