Legal Opinion

United States v. James Howard Wentz

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Decided September 19, 1986No. 85-5243PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WILKINSON, Circuit Judge:

James Howard Wentz was convicted on federal charges in connection with the theft of a 22-foot Bayliner boat. Wentz appeals on several grounds: first, that the jury received improper instructions concerning the value of the boat; second, that the trial judge violated Wentz’s rights under the Double Jeopardy Clause by allowing a retrial after Wentz successfully moved for a mistrial; and third, that the prosecution negligently allowed the boat to deteriorate. Finding no basis for reversal, we affirm Wentz’s conviction.

I

In May and June of 1983, undercover agents of the…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. California v. TrombettaSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Oregon v. KennedySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  3. Kirby Forest Industries, Inc. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  4. United States v. Murdock Head, (Two Cases)Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1983
  5. Robinson v. WadeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1982

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. United States v. Robert RuheCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1999
  2. United States v. Charly Sion Hagege, United States of America v. Charly Sion HagegeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
  3. United States v. Abel Parama BorromeoCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1992
  4. United States v. Kayode A. Oseni, Salvador A. Oseni, and Abdul K. JafaruCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1993
  5. United States v. Anthony Lee White (89-6462), and Cardine Humes (89-6461)Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1990

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API