Legal Opinion

Bank of Fairfield v. Spokane County

Washington Supreme Court

Decided May 17, 1933No. 24132. En BancPublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSteinert, J.

This case comprises fifty-eight separate actions, consolidated for purposes of trial and appeal. In each of the actions, the respective plaintiffs seek to invalidate certain taxes for the year 1928 levied under assessments, or rather reassessments, made on omitted property and on bank stocks in 1931, the original 1928 assessments having theretofore been can-celled. Upon a trial before the court, sitting without a jury, the assessments, or reassessments, and the taxes extended and levied thereon, were ordered cancelled and set aside, and the defendant perpetually enjoined from any further…

2Cases cited38 opinions

  1. Flint v. Stone Tracy Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1911
  2. Louisville Gas & Electric Co. v. ColemanSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
  3. Mercantile Bank v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
  4. Postal Telegraph Cable Co. v. AdamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
  5. Spring Valley Water Works v. SchottlerSupreme Court of the United States · 1884

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Daurelle v. Traders Federal Savings & Loan Ass'nWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1958
  2. Bade v. DrachmanCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1966
  3. Tagliani v. ColwellCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1973
  4. Rummens v. Home Savings & Loan Ass'nWashington Supreme Court · 1935
  5. State Ex Rel. Wicks v. Puget Sound Savings & Loan Ass'nWashington Supreme Court · 1941

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API