Territory v. Kim Ung Pil
Hawaii Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT BY
PERRY, J.
(Peters, C. J., dissenting.)
Tbe plaintiff in error was tried, convicted and sen-*726fenced under an indictment reading as follows, omitting tbe formal parts: “The grand jury of tbe first judicial circuit of tbe Territory of Hawaii do present that Kim Ung Pil at tbe City and County of Honolulu, Territory of Hawaii, and witbin tbe jurisdiction of this honorable court, on tbe 19tb day of July, 1921, with force and arms, in and upon one A. Osbira, tlien and there being, be, the said Kim Ung Pil, being then and there armed with a dangerous weapon, to wit, a revolver,…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- The Confiscation CasesSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
- Felton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
- Hill v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1894
- Clements v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1890
- State v. KennedySupreme Court of Missouri · 1900
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Goto v. LaneSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
- Territory v. GotoHawaii Supreme Court · 1923
- State v. Codiamat.Hawaii Supreme Court · 2013