In Re the Contempt of the Supreme Court of Indiana of Crenshaw

We find that the respondent, attorney Zena D. Crenshaw, is in contempt of this Court for failing to abide by investigative subpoenas issued to her by the Disciplinary Commission.

This case began on September 18, 1998, when the Commission filed its Verified Information and Motion far Order to Show Cause why Respondent Should not be Held in Contempt of Court. On January 8, 1999, the respondent filed her Verified Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction over Subject Matter. The Commission responded on Jan uary 20, 1999. On January 25, 1999, we issued an Order to Appear and Show Cause, directing…