Legal Opinion

State v. Fortmeyer

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided December 26, 2001No. C98-07-36224, C98-07-36223 A105233 (Control), A105260PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWollheim, J.

In this consolidated appeal, defendant Fortmeyer appeals from a judgment of conviction for manufacture and possession of a controlled substance, and defendant Palmer appeals from a judgment of conviction for possession of a controlled substance. ORS 475.992. Defendants assign error to the trial court’s denial of their motion to suppress evidence obtained pursuant to a search warrant. Defendants argue that the information used in the search warrant affidavit was obtained in the course of an illegal search, in violation of Article I, section 9, of the Oregon Constitution, and the Fourth…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. State v. EhlyOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  2. State v. KennedyOregon Supreme Court · 1983
  3. State v. CampbellOregon Supreme Court · 1988
  4. State v. TannerOregon Supreme Court · 1987
  5. State v. DixsonOregon Supreme Court · 1988

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. State v. Rodriguez-GanegarCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2003
  2. State v. Castillo-SalgadoCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2003
  3. State v. SanchezCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2015
  4. State v. FosterCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2008
  5. State v. MastCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2012

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API