Legal Opinion
McNaughton v. Boeing
Washington Supreme Court
Decided May 26, 1966No. 38475PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHill, J.
The respondent Bertha Boeing owns 53 acres of land north of Seattle, lying between 155th and 160th streets and west of Aurora Avenue.
The respondent Sears, Roebuck and Co., Inc., has indicated its desire to acquire this property for the purpose of a regional shopping center. Tracts of land in a single ownership suitable for such purposes are patently hard to come by.
Unfortunately for the eager purchaser and the willing seller, only the easterly 30 acres of the 53-acre tract had been zoned for business in 1946, the westerly 23 acres being then zoned for residential purposes. Parenthetically no…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Lillions v. GibbsWashington Supreme Court · 1955
- Pierce v. King CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1963
- Bartram v. Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1949
- State Ex Rel. Miller v. CainWashington Supreme Court · 1952
- Putney v. Abington TownshipSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1954
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Duckworth v. City of Bonney LakeWashington Supreme Court · 1978
- Anderson v. Island CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1972
- Lutz v. City of LongviewWashington Supreme Court · 1974
- Save Our Rural Environment v. Snohomish CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1983
- Bishop v. Town of HoughtonWashington Supreme Court · 1966
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.