Legal Opinion
Yeomans v. Wallace
District Court, D. Connecticut
Decided November 14, 2003No. CIV.A. 303CV0380SRUPublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Ruling on Dependant’s Motion to Dismiss
UNDERHILL, District Judge.
Arthur Yeomans, Jr. (“Yeomans”) brought this lawsuit against the Town of Stonington (“the Town”), Officer Dale Brummund (“Brummund”), Sandra E. Wallace a/k/a Sandra E. Luzzi (‘Wallace”), and George Luzzi (“Luzzi”) alleging a deprivation of civil rights under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (“Section 1983”) and several violations of state law. Yeoman alleges that Brummund, Wallace, and Luzzi deprived him of due process by entering and searching his business premises without probable cause and deprived him of his property without notice or the…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- City of Los Angeles v. HellerSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- United States v. PriceSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Gregory Branum v. Clifford Clark, David Hanson, Paul Szarmach, George Stein, and Ross GeogheganCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1991
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Bowers v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2013
- Zitta v. GrahamDistrict Court, D. Vermont · 2014