Reed v. Craig

CLAY, Commissioner. ,

’Appellant was injured when a motorcycle on which she was riding as a passenger collided with a taxicab owned by appellees. After a lengthy trial, the jury returned a verdict in the latte'rs’ 'favor.

Appellant’s brief fails to comply with our Court Rule 1.340, as it contains no classification of the points and authorities discussed, and no statement of the issues of law or fact. A number of questions are obliquely raised, making it difficult to determine the real grounds upon which she relies for reversal.

This was an intersection accident in Newport. Appellant was riding…