Legal Opinion
United States v. Friedland
District Court, D. Colorado
Decided July 2, 2001No. 96-N-1213PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER AND MEMORANDUM OF DECISION
NOTTINGHAM, District Judge.
This is a CERCLA action. Third-Party Defendant and Crossclaim Defendant A.O. Smith Corporation (“A.O.Smith”), moves for summary judgment in its favor on all third-party claims asserted against it by Defendant Robert M. Friedland (“Fried-land”), and on ah crossclaims asserted against it by third-party defendants Aztec Minerals Corporation, South Mountain Minerals Corporation, Grey Eagle Mining Corporation (collectively “the Aztec Group”) and Industrial Constructors Corporation (“ICC”). Specifically, A.O. Smith requests this court to…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- United States v. BestfoodsSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Sanchez v. Denver Public SchoolsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1998
- World of Sleep, Inc. v. La-Z-Boy Chair Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1985
- Lansford-Coaldale Joint Water Authority, in No. 92-7605 v. Tonolli Corporation Tonolli Canada, Ltd. Ifim International B v. in No. 92-7671Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1993
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Friedland v. Travelers Indemnity Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 2005
- City of Tulsa v. Tyson Foods, Inc.District Court, N.D. Oklahoma · 2003
- United States v. Pioneer Natural Res. Co.District Court, D. Colorado · 2018
- Colo. Dep't of Pub. Health v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 2019
- Dill v. Rembrandt Group, IncColorado Court of Appeals · 2020
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.