Legal Opinion
Davies v. Sallie Mae, Inc.
California Court of Appeal
Decided October 31, 2008No. A119944PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
RUVOLO, P. J.
Stephen T. Davies (Davies) appeals from the trial court’s grant of demurrers to his second amended complaint (SAC) without leave to amend. Finding the trial court committed no error in determining Davies’s SAC failed to state a cause of action against his student loan note holders, we affirm.
I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
Davies obtained federal Stafford student loans from respondents Sallie Mae, Inc. (Sallie Mae), and EdFund to fund his education between 1993 and 1997. In connection with his student loans, Davies signed a promissory note. Davies does not dispute his…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Cort v. AshSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Parks School of Business, Inc., Dba Parks College, a New Mexico Corporation v. Fife Symington Roy A. Nicholson Sally HeinCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
- City of Dinuba v. County of TulareCalifornia Supreme Court · 2007
- Reyes v. KoshaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
- Campbell v. Regents of University of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2005
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Bains v. MooresCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
- Pfeifer v. Countrywide Home Loans, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2012
- Barroso v. Ocwen Loan Servicing, LLCCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
- Corona Summit v. SPUS05 Corona Summit CA2/4California Court of Appeal · 2013
- Lemke v. Wells Fargo Bank CA3California Court of Appeal · 2021
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.