Legal Opinion

Margaret Clark v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Decided October 16, 1968No. 11727PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CRAVEN, Circuit Judge:

This action was brought against the United States under the Federal Tort Claims Act, 28 U.S.C. § 1346, to recover damages for medical malpractice of Army doctors who treated the plaintiff, Mrs. Margaret Clark, in 1958 at Tripler Army Hospital, Honolulu, Hawaii. From the judgment of the district court entered in favor of the plaintiff, the United States appeals contending that the trial judge erred in failing to weigh independently the evidence as to the proper standard of care and causation. We agree that the district judge erred in failing to clearly state his own…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Harry J. Hicks, Administrator of the Estate of Carol Greitens, Deceased v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1966
  2. Smith v. YoheSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1963
  3. Corn v. FrenchNevada Supreme Court · 1955
  4. Word v. HendersonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1965
  5. Reed v. ChurchSupreme Court of Virginia · 1940

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Hamil v. BashlineSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  2. Wilkinson v. VeseySupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1972
  3. Roberson v. CounselmanSupreme Court of Kansas · 1984
  4. Weimer v. HetrickCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1987
  5. Delaney v. CadeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1993

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API